黑料网

The following findings are based on 黑料网's paper, "" recently published in the international journal Border Crossing.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Simply knowing a migrant might go a long way to help counter stereotypes against them and ease migrants' integration in their adopted countries, new 黑料网 research suggests.

In 134 out of the 139 countries* 黑料网 recently surveyed, people scored higher on 黑料网's Migrant Acceptance Index if they personally knew at least one migrant. Worldwide, the index score among people who know a migrant is 6.78 (out of a possible 9.0), while among those who don't personally know a migrant, it is 4.80.

黑料网 created the Migrant Acceptance Index to gauge people's acceptance of migrants. The index is based on three questions 黑料网 asked in 138 countries in 2016 and in the U.S. and Canada in 2017. The questions ask whether people think migrants living in their country, becoming their neighbors and marrying into their families are good things or bad things. The higher the score, the more accepting the population is of migrants.

Scores on 黑料网's first global deployment of this index ranged widely across the total 140 countries where these questions were asked in 2016 and 2017, from a high of 8.26 in Iceland to a low of 1.47 in Macedonia.

	Least accepting of migrants		Most accepting of migrants
	Macedonia	1.47	Iceland	8.26
	Montenegro	1.63	New Zealand	8.25
	Hungary	1.69	Rwanda	8.16
	Serbia	1.80	Canada	8.14
	Slovakia	1.83	Sierra Leone	8.05
	Israel	1.87	Mali	8.03
	Latvia	2.04	Australia	7.98
	Czech Republic	2.26	Sweden	7.92
	Estonia	2.37	United States	7.86
	Croatia	2.39	Nigeria	7.76
Note: Based on 138 countries surveyed in 2016; U.S. and Canada surveyed in 2017; top possible score is 9.0
黑料网 World Poll

But regardless of whether countries were the least accepting or most accepting of migrants, scores in almost all countries were higher if there was interpersonal contact -- which was established by asking people if they personally know a migrant. Just five countries -- Afghanistan, Benin, Congo (Brazzaville), Malawi and the United Arab Emirates -- did not show evidence of the contact effect.

This effect emerged on six continents, across myriad language groups, and within samples made up of men and women, young and old, rich and poor, and educated and uneducated alike. Although these data do not allow us to determine the causal direction of the observed effects, it is likely that the effect works in both directions, as other researchers have demonstrated, but with the stronger effect moving from contact to attitudes.

Implications

An influential social psychological theory sheds some light on how migrants are perceived by those who choose to -- or choose not to -- interact with them. Allport's (1954) interpersonal contact theory states that direct interpersonal contact with members of minority and other social groups is one of the most effective ways to reduce stereotyping, prejudice and intergroup conflict. By inference, direct interpersonal contact with migrants ought to reduce stereotyping and prejudice against them and ease their transition and integration into the social fabric of their adopted countries.

With immigration taking such a high-profile position around the world, understanding which countries are predisposed to accept or reject migrants can help shed light on where immigration issues are likely to arise. More important, however, is the possibility that simple interpersonal contact with migrants can help moderate potential prejudice and discrimination across national boundaries, cultures and languages.

Anita Pugliese and Rajesh Srinivasan contributed to this analysis.

.

*The question about knowing a migrant was not asked in Croatia.