ºÚÁÏÍø

skip to main content
Politics
Americans See More ºÚÁÏÍø Bias; Most Can't Name Neutral Source
Politics

Americans See More ºÚÁÏÍø Bias; Most Can't Name Neutral Source

by and Zacc Ritter
Chart: data points are described in article

Story Highlights

  • 32% say media careful to separate fact from opinion; was 58% in 1984
  • 45% see great deal of political bias in news coverage, up from 25% in 1989
  • Majority cannot name a source that reports news objectively

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' perceptions of news media bias have increased significantly over the past generation. Thirty-two percent believe the news media are careful to separate fact from opinion, well below the 58% who held this view in 1984. Meanwhile, 66% currently agree that most news media do not do a good job of letting people know what is fact and what is opinion, up from 42%.

Americans More Likely to Say Media Are Not Careful to Separate Fact From Opinion

These results are based on a new . The large-scale mail survey of more than 19,000 U.S. adults was conducted Aug. 4-Oct. 2, 2017. The historical comparisons are based on a 1984 mail survey conducted by MORI Research for the American Society of ºÚÁÏÍøpaper Editors.

Additionally, the new ºÚÁÏÍø/Knight survey finds nearly half of Americans, 45%, saying there is "a great deal" of political bias in news coverage. This represents a sharp increase compared with what other polls have measured on the same question in the past, including 25% in a 1989 Pew Research Center telephone survey and 37% in that firm's .

Perceptions of media bias are strongly related to one's political leanings.

  • Fifty-three percent of Democrats, but only 27% of independents and 13% of Republicans, believe the media are careful to separate fact from opinion.
  • Twenty-six percent of Democrats versus 67% of Republicans perceive a great deal of political bias in news coverage. Independents fall more squarely between Republicans and Democrats on this measure, with 46% saying news coverage has a great deal of political bias.

Majorities of Americans consider each of seven possible types of bias evaluated in the survey to be problematic in news coverage today. A high of 69% say that news outlet owners attempting to influence the way stories are reported is a major problem, while a low of 57% say news organizations reporting information they believed to be accurate but that turned out to be inaccurate is a major problem.

Wide Variety of Forms of Bias Seen as Major Problems With ºÚÁÏÍø Coverage
Would you say each of the following is a major problem, a minor problem or not a problem with news coverage today?
Major problem Minor problem Not a problem
% % %
Owners of news outlets attempting to influence the way stories are reported 69 24 4
ºÚÁÏÍø organizations being too dramatic or too sensational in order to attract more readers or viewers 66 27 5
Too much bias in the reporting of news stories that are supposed to be objective 65 29 4
Too much bias in the selection of what stories news organizations cover or don't cover 64 29 4
More news sources reporting from a particular point of view rather than being neutral 61 31 6
Not enough investigative journalism to uncover important facts 59 30 8
ºÚÁÏÍø organizations reporting information they think is accurate but turns out to be inaccurate 57 35 6
Aug. 4-Oct. 2, 2017
ºÚÁÏÍø/Knight Foundation Survey on Trust, Media and Democracy

The concerns Americans express about these various forms of bias rival those they have about the spread of inaccurate information on the internet. A separate item found 73% of Americans saying the spread of false information over the web is a major problem today.

Majority in U.S. Cannot Name an Objective ºÚÁÏÍø Source

With perceptions of bias so pervasive, it is perhaps not surprising that less than a majority of Americans, 44%, say they can think of a news source that reports the news objectively. Even though Democrats are much less likely to perceive bias in the media than Republicans, Democrats are only somewhat more likely than Republicans to say they can think of an objective news source, 51% to 42%.

Americans who describe their ideological views as "very liberal," "liberal" or "very conservative"; have a postgraduate education; or are aged 65 and older are most likely to say they can identify an objective news source. Younger, less educated and moderate respondents are among the major subgroups least likely to say this.

Majority in U.S. Cannot Name an Objective ºÚÁÏÍø Source
Can you think of a news source that reports the news objectively?
Yes, can No, cannot
% %
U.S. adults 44 51
Party identification
Democrat 51 44
Independent 40 56
Republican 42 54
Age
18 to 29 years old 35 62
30 to 49 years old 40 56
50 to 64 years old 48 48
65+ years old 52 41
Education
Postgraduate 59 38
Four-year college degree only 50 47
Some college 43 53
High school or less 35 58
Ideology
Very liberal 67 29
Liberal 56 41
Moderate 38 57
Conservative 41 55
Very conservative 52 42
Aug. 4-Oct. 2, 2017
ºÚÁÏÍø/Knight Foundation Survey on Trust, Media and Democracy

The survey asked those who could name an objective source to identify which specific outlets they believe report news objectively. Among Republicans, Fox ºÚÁÏÍø was the overwhelming winner, with 60% of Republicans who named an objective news source identifying Fox ºÚÁÏÍø as that source.

There is far less agreement among Democrats about which news source is objective. Rather than coalescing around a single news organization, Democrats name a number of sources, led by CNN (21%) and NPR (15%).

Among age groups, Americans aged 50 and older who named an objective news source identify Fox ºÚÁÏÍø by a significant margin over other news outlets. Those younger than 50 are about as likely to name CNN, NPR or Fox ºÚÁÏÍø as organizations that report the news objectively.

Among educational groups, postgraduates who could mention a news source most commonly mentioned NPR, at 19%, followed by CNN and Fox ºÚÁÏÍø at 13% each. NPR also ranks first among very liberal respondents, at 26%, with only 1% naming Fox ºÚÁÏÍø. By contrast, solid majorities of very conservative (58%) and conservative (55%) respondents who could think of an objective source mentioned Fox ºÚÁÏÍø.

##SPEEDBUMP##

Implications

Americans' perceptions of bias in news reporting have grown and are now a fairly common view, likely explaining the decline in trust in the media in recent decades. Less than half of Americans can identify a single news source they believe reports news objectively.

These trends are troubling for the maintenance of a sustainable, healthy democracy that relies in part on a well-informed citizenry. Americans still widely believe the media have a critical role to play in supporting U.S. democracy. But a concerted effort is necessary to restore their faith in the press to deliver objective news.

Read the full : "Americans' Views: Trust, Media and Democracy"

Survey Methods

Results are based on mail interviews conducted Aug. 4-Oct. 2, 2017, with a random sample of 19,196 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. ºÚÁÏÍø used a randomly selected Addressed-Based Sampling (ABS) design. The study included oversamples of households known to contain members of hard-to-reach subgroups, including blacks, Hispanics and young adults. The sample was weighted to correct for unequal probability of selection and nonresponse, to match the national demographics on gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region and population density.

For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.


ºÚÁÏÍø /poll/225755/americans-news-bias-name-neutral-source.aspx
ºÚÁÏÍø World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030