ºÚÁÏÍø

skip to main content
Economy
U.S. Unadjusted Unemployment Unchanged in June
Economy

U.S. Unadjusted Unemployment Unchanged in June

by

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. unemployment, as measured by ºÚÁÏÍø without seasonal adjustment, was 8.0% in June, unchanged from May, but significantly better than the 8.7% from a year ago. ºÚÁÏÍø's seasonally adjusted number, based on applying an estimate of the government's June adjustment, is 7.8%, an improvement from 8.3% in May, and down considerably from 8.5% in June 2011. Both the unadjusted and the adjusted numbers are at least tied for the lowest ºÚÁÏÍø has recorded since it began collecting employment data in 2010.

ºÚÁÏÍø Adjusted and Unadjusted Unemployment Rate Trend, January 2011-June 2012

These results are based on ºÚÁÏÍø Daily tracking interviews, conducted by landline and cell phone, with more than 30,000 Americans throughout the month. ºÚÁÏÍø calculates a seasonally adjusted unemployment rate by applying the adjustment factor the government used for the same month in the previous year. The government adjusted its May numbers up last year, but adjusted the June numbers down, which accounts for the change in seasonally adjusted unemployment between May and June.

U.S. underemployment, as measured without seasonal adjustment, dropped to 17.5% in June, down from 18% the previous month, and the lowest since November 2010. ºÚÁÏÍø's U.S. underemployment measure combines the unemployed with those working part time but looking for full-time work. ºÚÁÏÍø does not apply a seasonal adjustment to underemployment.

ºÚÁÏÍø's U.S. Underemployment Rate, Monthly Averages, 2011-2012

The number of part-timers wanting full-time work dropped to 9.5%, accounting for all of the improvement in underemployment. However, it is little changed from 9.6% a year ago, when a similar decline was recorded from May to June. It may be that the improvement in June was the result of summer seasonal hiring, and won't continue into the fall.

Percentage of U.S. Workers Working Part Time but Wanting Full-Time Work,\nMonthly Averages, 2011-2012

Forty-five percent of underemployed workers in the U.S. are hopeful they will find a job or full-time work in the next four weeks, a slight deterioration from 47% a month ago. Hope declined among both the unemployed and part-timers wanting full-time work. However, workers remain more hopeful about finding work than they did in January through March.

Hope of Finding a Job in the Next Four Weeks, 2012 Trend

Implications

The employment situation in the U.S. remains fragile, which is reflected in the pullback in reported hope for a job. Job seekers may be reacting to less-than-optimistic discussions of the economy by the news media, as reflected in a . Just as likely, though, is that the decline is the result of real challenges Americans in the workforce faced during the job hunt in June.

ºÚÁÏÍø's drop in seasonally adjusted unemployment suggests that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics may report a decline in unemployment when the numbers are released on Friday. However, as ºÚÁÏÍø's unadjusted data show, little has changed month over month, and just as many Americans were unemployed in June as in May.

ºÚÁÏÍø Unemployment Measures, June 2012

How ºÚÁÏÍø's Unemployment Measure Differs From the U.S. Government's Measure

ºÚÁÏÍø.com reports results from these indexes in daily, weekly, and monthly averages and in ºÚÁÏÍø.com stories. Complete trend data are always available to view and export in the following charts:

Daily: , , ,
Weekly: , , ,

about ºÚÁÏÍø's economic measures.

our economic release schedule.

Survey Methods

Results are based on telephone interviews conducted as part of ºÚÁÏÍø Daily tracking from June 1-30, with a random sample of 30,294 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, selected using random-digit-dial sampling.

For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample includes a minimum quota of 400 cell phone respondents and 600 landline respondents per 1,000 national adults, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents by region. Landline telephone numbers are chosen at random among listed telephone numbers. Cell phone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.

Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, adults in the household, and phone status (cell phone only/landline only/both, cell phone mostly, and having an unlisted landline number). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2011 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older non-institutionalized population living in U.S. telephone households. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting and sample design.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

For more details on ºÚÁÏÍø's polling methodology, visit .


ºÚÁÏÍø Unemployment Measures Among Demographic Groups, June 2012


ºÚÁÏÍø /poll/155486/Unadjusted-Unemployment-Unchanged-June.aspx
ºÚÁÏÍø World Headquarters, 901 F Street, Washington, D.C., 20001, U.S.A
+1 202.715.3030